"Just Someone" <just.some@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Actually, most table are VERY small. On each schema I would expect 4 - > 5 tables to go over 1000 records. The rest will be much smaller, with > most at under 100. And aside from 2-3 tables, the activity will be > pretty low (few records a day at the most extreme). > Can I use this to optimize the fsm part in a different way? Seems like a one-page table hardly needs an FSM entry at all: there's only one place to look for free space anyway. Maybe we should have a threshold for the minimum size a table must be before it gets an FSM entry. regards, tom lane
