Search Postgresql Archives

Re: About updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks Andreas. That was a quick response. So way 1 must be quicker.



am  10.03.2006, um 10:46:39 -0500 mailte Emi Lu folgendes:
Hello,

postgresql 8.0.1, in a plpgsql function

To update columns' values in a table (without OID), if I ran:
1. "update table1 set col1 = ..., col2 = ... ... col100 ="

or
2.
"update table1 set col1 = "
...
"update table1 set col100 = "

way 1 only has one disk I/O, right? While way 2 is more time consuming since there is disk I/O when a update is ran.

Because of MVCC every UPDATE is practical a DELETE + INSERT.
Way1: you have only one DELETE+INSERT, Way2 one hundred, and you have
100 dead rows until the next VACUUM.


HTH, Andreas



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux