Re: Accessing composite type columns in indexes

[Michael Glaesemann <grzm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mar 4, 2006, at 14:17 , Tom Lane wrote:

> The UNIQUE/PRIMARY KEY syntax only allows bare column names, per  
> the SQL
> standard.  While there's not any technical reason why we couldn't  
> extend
> that syntax, there's a pretty large fear factor involved: we could  
> find
> ourselves behind the spec-compliance eight-ball if the SQL committee
> exercises their prerogative to extend the syntax in some other
> direction.

Cool. Thanks for the explanation.

Michael Glaesemann
grzm myrealbox com