Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@xxxxxxx> writes: > An int4 field is required to be aligned at a 4-byte boundary internally, so > there are 3 bytes wasted between tmp_A.c and tmp_A.i. If you switch the > order of the fields you should see space savings. Probably not, because the row-as-a-whole has alignment requirements too. In this example you'll just move the pad bytes from one place to another. regards, tom lane
