Bruce Momjian <pgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Currently we output the ctid as a string: > snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), "(%u,%u)", blockNumber, offsetNumber); > Perhaps someday we should consider outputting that as an array or a > result set: It's not an array, because the two components are not of the same data type; and it's not a result set, any more than (say) a point or a box is. What it is is a record datatype. There might be some usefulness to adding SQL functions to allow extraction of the block number and item number fields, though we'd have some problems with the lack of a uint4 datatype to represent the block number field's type. The demand for this has been too low to make me feel we need to expend that effort... regards, tom lane
