On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 07:28:20AM -0500, Robert Treat wrote: > On Monday 13 February 2006 01:49, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > First of all, it isn't all that hard to figure out whether a view is > > probably updatable (the presence of the respective rules would be a > > strong hint). And second, if it's not, you get a fine error message > > and can move on. So there is really no good reason for client tools to > > prevent you from using data entry forms on views. > > One problem is the only way for a client tool to work generically in provding > data entry forms would be to provide entry for all columns, which would break > in all but the most trivial of cases. Last time we discussed this for > phppgadmin, the general opinion was it wasn't worth trying to work around > postgresql core's deficiency. Once the core postgresql server supports > updatable views in proper, I'd imagine this would get done. True, but the client should allow it (possibly with a warning). Not allowing people to generate forms on a view just because it may not be updatable seems silly... There's plenty of info on how to create updatable views on PostgreSQL, allowing users to indicate themselves which fields are updatable seems better than trying to guess from the database. In the general case, if there are any INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE RULEs on a view, there is no way for the client to determine what the effect will be except in the simplest of cases, letting the user specify seems the best bet. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
