Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
From: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 22:46:46 -0500
Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Comments: In-reply-to "Karl O. Pinc" <kop@xxxxxxxx> message dated "Thu, 09 Feb 2006 03:18:09 +0000"
In-reply-to: <1139455089l.20096l.31l@mofo>
References: <1139455089l.20096l.31l@mofo>

"Karl O. Pinc" <kop@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> It would have been nice to have an option to SQL's VACUUM that would
> ignore the cost-based delays so as to bring that database back
> to life as rapidly as possible.  (Likewise the vacuumdb shell
> command.)

What's wrong with SET?

			regards, tom lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
  - From: Karl O. Pinc

References:
- Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
  - From: Karl O. Pinc

Prev by Date: What's faster?
Next by Date: Re: What's faster?
Previous by thread: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Next by thread: Re: Request to have VACUUM ignore cost based limits
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux