On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:40:40PM +0100, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > I will also point out that none of the replication solutions have the > same solid reputation as postgresql. As long the postgresql team will > not endorse a replication solution, you can not expect people to put the > same trust in these solutions as we put into postgresql itself. So you're saying that unless PostgreSQL Core (which I assume you're referring to with "postgresql team") endorse a pile of code that they neither wrote, audited nor have any experience with, it won't be good enough for you? I rather they didn't endorse anything they wern't sure of. Replication is hard. There are many replication solutions for Postgres, both multi-master and master/slave and sync/async. I'd rather these products prove themselves than by anyone stamping them Endorsed. > Oracle do endorse their own replication solution after all. I suppose they had a hand in writing it too... Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
