"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> Anyone think it might be reasonable to add a GUC option that tells >> autovacuum to monitor for wraparound only, and not for more general >> usage based vacuuming? Something like autovac_wraparound_only. Not >> sure I like the idea, but thought it might be worth some discussion. > I believe 8.1 will actually stop allowing transactions if a wraparound > is going to occur. Yeah. I don't see any value to running autovac *only* for this purpose. regards, tom lane
