On Mon, Dec 19, 2005 at 08:37:26PM +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote: > I don't know which locales are affected. It just can't be that > widespread because we're not getting similar reports for 99% of the > locales out there. Not getting reports doesn't mean the problem is rare. Perhaps people moved to another database. Perhaps people decided to solve their problem in client code. Perhaps 50% of all potential locales haven't been put to use with PostgreSQL such that the problem showed up. It's definitely worth doing something about. Had I the skills would I myself help with it. Karsten -- GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
