Joshua D. Drake wrote: > I don't know about that because I am hoping to start provided .debs as > well and > .debs are going to be at a minimum /linux/debs/ubuntu and /linux/debs/debian But Debian packages are not only available on Linux. (The same is reportedly true of RPM, but I don't know of a practical example.) I think debian, redhat, etc. are the operating system names that parallel "win32". "linux" should just disappear. And so should "rpms" or "debs" unless it's part of the tree's internal organisation. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
