Hi, On Sat, 2005-12-17 at 09:19 -0800, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >This patch should be sent to SuSE, not PostgreSQL. > Actually, I think this should be incoporated into a spec file > specifically for suse within the PGDG rpms. Well... PGDG RPM Building Project only aims to build RPMs for Red Hat and Fedora Core. This has been so before, and personally *I* intend to continue with the same policy. Also, Reinhard Max is building official up2date SuSE packages. One may state that Tom Lane is building RPMs for Fedora Core / Red Hat, however RHEL policy does not allow users by upgrading to latest versions via up2date; so I know that those people (including me :-) ) use the community RPM versions to keep up with the latest version. So, as Bruce stated, the patch (does not fit into our spec and) should be redirected to SuSE. Regards, -- The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. 1.503.667.4564 PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting Co-Authors: PL/php, plPerlNG - http://www.commandprompt.com/
