Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > >The distinction is that RPMs and pginstaller are port-specific, binary > >distributions. > > > > > So they can't be considered official port releases for the PGDG? They > are not "forks". > Or, are you saying that the only official PGDG release is the source? Yes, I think the only official PGDG stuff is source. The binaries are done by port-specific teams. PGDG doesn't deal with MSI installer issues, or RPM issues, only the port-specific teams do. I know I don't read any RPM emails and any MSI issues are dealt with by the Win32 people. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | (610) 359-1001 + If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073
