Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Performance large tables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Dec 13, 2005, at 2:49 AM, Franz.Rasper@xxxxxx wrote:

What is the performance difference between U320 15kRPM and U320 10kRPM ?
Does your RAID crontoller has some memory (e.g. 128 MB or 256 MB )
and something like memory backup write cache (like HP DL 380 server) ?
Do you use Intel or Opteron cpus ?

The 15k drives have higher sustained throughput so theoretically they would be faster for sequential scans of data. I have no hard numbers about this, though. See my thread on choosing between them from last thursday.

As for RAID controller, I've been using LSI MegaRAID 320-2x controller lately. I like it a lot. I configure 1/2 the disks on one channel and 1/2 on the other and RAID mirror and RAID 10 them across the channels. I *always* get battery backup for the controllers. No point not to do so.

As for Intel vs. Opteron: Opteron hands down. The Intel Xeon EM64T are adequate for low-end use, but for really pushing the bits back and forth the Opterons are the top of the heap in performance.



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux