Benjamin Smith <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > And, this dropped the query time from between 2.2-30 seconds all the > way down to just 55-ish ms, without any new indexes! What's more, the > improvement came from a move of a block I thought more or less > unimportant! > // tries to put jaw back into mouth // Yeah ... we really need to fix the planner so it can do this for you, as it does with regular inner joins ... regards, tom lane
