Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Performance large tables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 03:22:47PM -0800, Benjamin Arai wrote:
> My issue actually stems from the fact that I cannot do large weekly 
> updates on fast enough to meet a weekend window for the following work 
> week.  I am currently using a machine with a raid 1, 4GB RAM, and dual 
> opteron.  I could go 0+1 but peroformance increase is only about 20% 
> from the benchmarks I have read.  ANY suggestions would be greatly 
> appreciated.

Since you have given us no information to work with you're not going to
get any specific recommendations either. If you can tell is the things
you do most commonly and are most performance sensetive (exact
commands, timings, versions and settings please) we may be able to
help.
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

Attachment: pgpjoO8XryMxZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux