> > A & (B | (New OperatorTheNextWordMustFollow York)) > I had thought about this before myself. Alas I have never had the time to properly investigate implementing such a feature. :( A & (B | (New + York)) Something like that? > Actually, I love that idea. Oleg, would it be possible to create a > tsquery operator that understands proximity? Or, how allowing a > predicate to the current '&' op, as in '&[dist<=1]' meaning "next > token follows with a max distance of 1". I imagine that it would > only be useful on unstripped tsvectors, but if the lexem position is > already stored ... > Would the proximity go in both directions? Or just forward? What about tokens that come before? Just a thought. Andy
