In the absence of replies (and sorry to bombard the list), I should clarify my question: Is it OK to use logical volume management to run an xfs partition hosting postgres data? (The server specs are below.) Thanks for any replies. Rory On 05/12/05, Rory Campbell-Lange (rory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > [Didn't get any replies on the Perform list -- hoping someone can help > me here] > > Hi. We have a server provided for a test of a web application with the > following specifications: > > 1 Dual core 1.8GHz Opteron chip > 6 GB RAM > approx 250GB of RAID10 storage (LSI card + BBU, 4 x 15000 RPM,16MB > Cache SCSI disks) > > The database itself is very unlikely to use up more than 50GB of storage > -- however we are going to be storing pictures and movies etc etc on the > server. > > I understand that it is better to run pg_xlog on a separate spindle but > we don't have that option available at present. > > Normally I use ext3. I wondered if I should make my normal partitions > and then make a +/- 200GB LVM VG and then slice that initially into a > 100GB ext3 data directory and a 50GB xfs postgres data area, giving > 100GB to use between these as they grow. I haven't used LVM with xfs > before, however. > > Advice gratefully received. > Rory > > -- Rory Campbell-Lange <rory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <www.campbell-lange.net>