Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Why pgAdmin III guru suggests VACUUM in 8.1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> I agree that the "processing database" message isn't too exciting, but
> it seems that forcing per-table messages up to LOG level would create
> even more log clutter.  I could support "processing table" at level
> DEBUG1 and "processing database" at DEBUG2.  Or maybe we should think
> harder about the idea recently mentioned of letting the autovacuum
> process have its own log-level setting, separate from ordinary backends'
> setting.

I would be helpful that the message gives the result also, like

23 tables in database 'foo' processed, 45 tables skipped,  12345 dead tuples 
removed in 45 seconds

Andrus. 




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux