On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 16:50:00 +0300, Oleg Bartunov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, Hannes Dorbath wrote: > > >I'm playing a bit with it ATM. Indexing one Gigabyte of plain text worked > >well, with 10 GB I yet have some performance problems. I read the TSearch > >Tuning Guide and will start optimizing some things, but is it a realistic > >goal to index ~90GB plain text and get sub-second response times on > >hardware that ~4000 EUR can buy? > > What's ATM ? As for the sub-second response times it'd very depend on > your data and queries. It'd be certainly possible with our tsearch daemon > which we postponed, because we inclined to implement inverted indices first > and then build fts index on top of inverted index. But this is long-term > plan. I believe in this context, 'ATM' is an ancronym for 'at the moment' which has little impact on the meaning of the paragraph.
