Search Postgresql Archives

Re: implicit index created, do I need to also create an explicit index?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 01:38:59PM -0800, Mark Harrison wrote:
> So I create a table with unique fields, and it creates an implicit index.
> 
> 1.  This is a general purpose index, correct?  I.e. not used solely for
>     ensuring uniqueness, so I don't need to create another index on
>     the same field explicitly, right?

Right

> 2.  What are the implications of creating another index, such as
>      create index foo on tv_workspace(name)?  Is is just a duplicate
>     of the implicitly created index?

Well, if one is unique and the other isn't, they're not quite
identical. But the latter is redundant and probably won't ever be
used...

Have a nice day,
-- 
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a
> tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone
> else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.

Attachment: pgpuc6msmMdyO.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux