On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:18:26AM -0800, Steve Crawford wrote: > Not trivial? Seems to me more like impossible to implement for the > general case which would require you to resolve the situation where > someone requests multiple, overlapping, clustered partial indexes > where the ordering requirements are in conflict. Well, currently you can only cluster on a single index per table, and I really doubt that will change. In any case, if someone's going to work on clustered indexes I think it would be much more worthwhile to make them self-maintaining (or at least more self-maintaining). -- Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117 vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461 ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
