--- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:15:45AM -0500, Greg Stark > wrote: > > > > Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > My advice to the Rails people would be to fix > whatever it is in their > > > code that is assuming a particular sequence > name, or indeed assuming > > > a sequence at all... > > > > Well how else do you find the id of the last > inserted record without assuming > > a sequence? > > I suppose using something like: > > select currval( pg_get_serial_sequence( > 'table','col' ) ); I like that better than the current 'table_col_seq'. Perhaps just currval('table', 'col'). Or perhaps tables could be made to have a default sequence (one that's associated with the primary key). CSN > > That avoids hardcoding the sequence id. Not assuming > a sequences at all > may be trickier. > > Have a nice day, > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> > http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% > perspiration. A patent is a > > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting > around waiting for someone > > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings