Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Starting PostgreSQL 8.0.4 with more memory [FreeBSD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 10:58, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 15:44 +0100, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 31, 2005 at 01:34:12PM +0000, Simon Riggs wrote:
> > > > Secondly, you're assuming that PostgreSQLs caching is at least as
> > > > efficient as the OS caching, which is more of an assertion than
> > > > anything else.
> > > 
> > > Do you doubt that? Why would shared_buffers be variable otherwise? 
> > 
> > Because the optimal hasn't been found and is probably different for
> > each machine.
> > 
> > There have been tests that demonstrate that you can raise the buffers
> > to a certain point which is optimal and after that it just doesn't
> > help [1]. They peg optimal size at 5-10% of memory.
> 
> Please read the rest of that thread. Those results and their conclusions
> were refuted in some detail, which lead to a number of optimizations in
> 8.0 and 8.1, mostly written by Tom.
> 
> > Also, as Tom pointed out, any memory assigned to shared buffers can't
> > be used for sorts, temporary tables, plain old disk caching, trigger
> > queues or anything else that isn't shared between backends. There are
> > far more useful uses of memory than just buffering disk blocks.
> 
> Your point was about cache efficiency as an argument for not increasing
> shared_buffers. Politely, I don't accept that argument. Clearly, there
> are some other considerations (for which I agree completely) but those
> don't prevent you increasing shared_buffers, they just place limits on
> your overall memory budget which could effect shared_buffers of course.

As I understand it, when the last backend referencing a collection of
data stops referencing it, that the buffers holding that data are
released, and if, a second later, another backend wants the data, then
it has to go to the Kernel for it again.

Is this still the case in 8.1?

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to
       choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not
       match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux