Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich@xxxxxx> writes: > Tom Lane schrob: >> And on top of that, what if the error was one that the backend can't >> recover from except by a transaction abort? If some level of the C++ >> code thinks it can catch and recover from the error, you've left >> things in a pretty bad state. > Hmm, but if you replace "C++" with "C" and "catch" with "PG_TRY" in > that sentence, wouldn't that be business as usual? Sure, but one hopes that someone writing PG_TRY is clued-in enough to consider this issue. The thing that is worrying me here is that generic STL code written by someone who never heard of Postgres is going to try to make decisions about whether it can recover from an error thrown by some part of the backend. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
