Search Postgresql Archives

Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Oracle buys Innobase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gregory Youngblood wrote:

On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 12:05 -0700, Chris Travers wrote:

5)  Independant patent license firms.  I guess it is a possibility, but in the end, companies that mostly manufacture lawsuits usually go broke.  Why would you sue a non-profit if you were mostly trying to make a buck with the lawsuit?

IANAL, but I think this category would be higher. For the simple reason that the non-profit might be viewed as low-hanging fruit and easy to pluck.

Remember, what some of these (a lot?) "patent license firms" (now that's a lot nicer than what I would have called them) try to do is get easy targets to license the patent. This makes it easier to get other companies to license the patent.

Often, the smaller targets will settle and license the patent because the cost to defend themselves is so high that it is cheaper to pay the license fees than to fight (this sounds familiar, oh yeah, protection rackets). These "firms" then use those licensees to legitimize their patent, claiming others licensing the patent "proves" their patent is enforceable. Then they target bigger and more lucrative fish.

IANAL either, but I am hard pressed to determine where such a settlement proves anything (at least in the US). Now if you go to trial and lose, then the same defenses may be unavailable to others. I.e. if the court determines that your arguments for X being prior art do not impact the invention in question, then the next defendant will probably be barred from arguing that X is prior art at least in reference to the same invention. But this cuts both ways... If the courts determine that X *is* prior art, then the patent may be limited by the courts. I.e. prior suits don't prevent new defenses which is why serial enforcement of patents is so dangerous (sooner or later, maybe someone finds a chink in the armor), but facts necessarily decided as part of one case are generally considered beyond dispute.

Again, Remember RamBus? They collapsed suddenly when someone finally came up with a defense that invalidated one of their critical patents.

Best Wishes,
Chris Travers
Metatron Technology Consulting

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?

              http://archives.postgresql.org

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux