Yes. I did read it wrong. I wanted to find all records
that contained x where x >= 10000
I am using ANY in my query on my test box I copied the
ALL from example query in the docs, which still isn't
working for me.
--- Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Matthew Peter <survivedsushi@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > Shouldn't >= also return Carols records since she
> > contains records GREATER THAN 10000?
>
> You seem to be reading the construct backwards.
>
> x >= ALL (array)
>
> is true if x >= every member of the array. This is
> clearly false
> for x = 10000 and array = {20000, 25000, 25000,
> 25000} ... in fact,
> x isn't >= any of those members.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
__________________________________
Yahoo! Music Unlimited
Access over 1 million songs. Try it free.
http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited/
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
