han.holl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> I've increased the statistics to 1000, and only occasionally, because of the
> very uneven distribution of surnames, the planner does the wrong thing.
> I've tried to set an even higher limit, but 1000 seems to be the maximum.
> Is this hardcoded, or can I set a higher maximum somewhere ?
You'd have to change the source code, but it's a simple tweak in the
ALTER SET STATISTICS code.
> If the only penalty is slower analyzing, I don't care: we analyze at night
> when these system are idle.
You'd be wrong about that --- the planner operations that use the data
would necessarily be slower, too. I don't have any concrete information
about how much slower, but I'd be hesitant to raise the figure much
beyond 1000 ...
However, if you can show you have a real-world case that benefits, I'd
be willing to think about raising the wired-in limit to 10000 or so.
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
