On Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 12:45:17PM -0500, Mike Nolan wrote: > > I don't know if it's guarenteed by spec, but it certainly seems silly > > for strings to compare equal when they're not. Just because a locale > > sorts ignoring case doesn't mean that "sun" and "Sun" are the same. The > > only real sensible rule is that strcoll should return 0 only if strcmp > > would also return zero... > > I disagree. Someone who wants true case independence (for whatever reason) > needs all aspects of uniqueness such as selects, indexes and groups > treating data the same way. > > This needs to be something the person who creates the instance or the > database can control. Such people need to be looking at citext [1]. My point is that the *locale* should not be case-insensetive that way. Consider that if the locale treats "sun" and "Sun" identically, then I can't have case-sensetivity if I want it. If they are treated differently, I can build case-insensetivity on top of it. [1] http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/citext/projdisplay.php -- Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them.
Attachment:
pgpJ778jjFjrV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
