Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > If that does change the results, it indicates you've got strings which > are bytewise different but compare equal according to strcoll(). We've > seen this and other misbehaviors from some locale definitions when faced > with data that is invalid per the encoding the locale expects. There are plenty of non-bytewise-identical strings that do legitimately compare equal in various locales. Does the hash code hash strxfrm or the original bytes? -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
