Brent Wood <b.wood@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > That is not me. Sigh. Is there any way I can develop (with the various > "create or replace function" iterations this wiil probably require) this > plperlu function as a non superuser? If you could, it would be a security hole, which we would fix with utmost alacrity. Untrusted-language functions may only be created by superusers. Can you compartmentalize the depth-accessing function as a small plperlu function, and do all the interesting stuff in plain plperl atop that? regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
