* Ben (bench@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > Sweet, indeed it is. DISTINCT ON seems to be a postgresism, but I can > live with that. Uhhh, I was pretty sure it was standard SQL... I'd have to go look it up though, to be sure. Don't forget to order by to make sure you get something consistent. :) Enjoy, Stephen
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
