a beter idea is to use yyyy-mm-dd hh:mi:ss format 2005/8/29, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 04:48:49PM -0400, Crystle Numan wrote: > > Dear all: > > > > I am fairly knowledgeable about PostgreSQL but this behaviour is > > stumping me. Any help would be wonderful. If you think it is a bug, let > > me now and I'll file one. > > > > (select values in DB (date stamps) between Jan 1, 2000 and Jan 1, 2005, > > no results) > > <snip results> > > Looks to me like "value" is a string type, is this possible? > > ORDER BY value should make it more obvious. > -- > Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@xxxxxxxxx> http://svana.org/kleptog/ > > Patent. n. Genius is 5% inspiration and 95% perspiration. A patent is a > > tool for doing 5% of the work and then sitting around waiting for someone > > else to do the other 95% so you can sue them. > > > -- Atte Moises Alberto Lindo Gutarra Consultor y Desarrollador Java / Open Source TUMI Solutions SAC Tel: +51.13481104 Cel: +51.197366260 MSN : mlindo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: In versions below 8.0, the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match
