Oliver Jowett wrote:
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
Is it a jdbc bug that is returning the answer as
org.postgresql.util.PGobject instead of some kind of Number?
The column's type is 'xid' which the driver doesn't currently handle, so
it gets put into the "wrap it in PGobject" bucket.
Is xid a type of number?
I'm not sure what's changed between 7.4 & 8.0 -- did you also change
JDBC driver versions?
yes
Perhaps your server should convert instances of PGobject to their string
representations before returning them across RMI.
That's what I'll do. Are there any other classes besides
org.postgresql.util.PGobject that I have to worry about?
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
