Search Postgresql Archives

What's up with EnterpriseDB?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
From: Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 16:48:29 -0500
In-reply-to: <005401c59df3$3880b520$9a00a8c0@OTTO>
References: <200508100747.j7A7lh441899@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <005401c59df3$3880b520$9a00a8c0@OTTO>
Sender: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)

I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle compatiblility.

What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did theyimplement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?


Tony



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
  - From: Christopher Browne
- Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
  - From: Joshua D. Drake

References:
- Change to PostgreSQL
  - From: Félix Beltrán
- PL/PGSQL parameter count vs perfomace
  - From: Havasvölgyi Ottó

Prev by Date: Re: NULL value without indicator in line 250.
Next by Date: Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
Previous by thread: PL/PGSQL parameter count vs perfomace
Next by thread: Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Postgresql Jobs] [Postgresql Admin] [Postgresql Performance] [Linux Clusters] [PHP Home] [PHP on Windows] [Kernel Newbies] [PHP Classes] [PHP Books] [PHP Databases] [Postgresql & PHP] [Yosemite]

Powered by Linux