Bruce Momjian <pgman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > E'' is more a marker than a type. I realize making E a type might work, > but it seems unusual. > > What we could do is backpatch E'' to 8.0.X as a no-op like it will be in > 8.1. What happens if someone already has a type called "e" ? -- greg ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend
