Thanks for your help. But still, do you think there could be a way to
alter the dblink_current_query() function so that it could return the
right query? Or should I try to build the query in a function and send
it through dblink instead of dblink_current_query()?
I've also been told that oracle has an auditing service that records
every action the users make, including the queries issued. If pg has
something like that I could use it instead.
On 8/1/05, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joao Afonso <joaoaafonso@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > So (finally), my question is why does this happen? Using instead on
> > the users_util insert rule shouldn't discard the original query and
> > rewrite it according to the specified on the rule?? Is this a problem
> > of dblink?
>
> I hadn't noticed the dblink_current_query() function before, but now
> that I see it, I consider it a pretty bad idea. It certainly will not
> help you the way you are hoping, because what it returns is the text of
> the interactive command the backend is currently working on --- which
> could be indefinitely far removed from the operation your rule is firing
> for.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
