I believe the correct way is the following. 1. get the oid from pg_class for relname='pg_toast_100194' 2. lookup up the relname from pg_class where reltoastrelid = the oid from the first query. so on my system select oid from pg_class where relname='pg_toast_17070'; oid ------- 17072 (1 row) select relname from pg_class where reltoastrelid=17072; relname -------------- sql_features (1 row) ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Akash Garg <akash.garg@xxxxxxxxx> To: Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 10:35:40 -0700 Subject: Re: Error while vacuuming > Sounds good -- I will try that. Will this REINDEX lock any queries > that are currently running on the database? And is there anway to > find out what table this toast table is related to? > > Thanks, > Akash > > On 7/18/05, Tom Lane <tgl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Akash Garg <akash.garg@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > I get this error when I run a VACUUM: > > > INFO: vacuuming "pg_toast.pg_toast_100194" > > > vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "friend" failed: ERROR: could not > > > open segment 1 of relation "pg_toast_100194_index" (target block > > > 1226167840): No such file or directory > > > > > I'm assuming I can just delete and recreate the index in question, > > > although I'm not sure which index or table it's talking about. Any > > > ideas? > > > > This probably means a corrupt next-page link in some page of the index. > > I'd suggest > > REINDEX TABLE pg_toast.pg_toast_100194; > > > > You might want to do the usual song and dance about memory and disk > > hardware checks, too. > > > > regards, tom lane > > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster ------- End of Original Message ------- ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org