"Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I maintain that it makes more sense for those few people who regularly look
> at system functions to add a "S" than to have everyone else have to do
> things such as "\df public."
@@aol(me too).
fwiw, i think "few" may be a bit optimistic here. Don't forget you can do
things like this if you forget what arguments array_lower takes:
db=> \df array_lower
List of functions
Result data type | Schema | Name | Argument data types
------------------+------------+-------------+---------------------
integer | pg_catalog | array_lower | anyarray, integer
(1 row)
Or this to get a list of all the standard array functions.
db=> \df array_*
P.S. The use of capital "s" is possible a source of some of the resistance. It
seems like a lowercase "s" or something else that doesn't need multiple
keystrokes would be a lot easier to type. Is there some limitation on the
\command parser that makes \dfs harder?
--
greg
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
