Search Postgresql Archives

Re: Hash Function: MD5 or other?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 14.06.2005, 02:40 -0400 schrieb Greg Stark:
> Shelby Cain <alyandon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > > My question is: is the builtin MD5 appropriate for this use or should I be
> > > using a function from pl/something? Figures on collision rates would be
> > > nice as well - the typical chunk of text is probably 1k-8k.
> 
> Note that MD5 is slow and CPU-intensive. By design.
> 
> If you want a quick way to find matching records then you might find something
> like CRC to be more useful. With MD5 it's supposed to be hard for someone to
> come up with inputs that hash to a target value, but if you're not too worried
> about people trying to do that then MD5 is probably overkill.
> 
Sha1 is said to be faster.
(And less likely to collisions)
-- 
Tino Wildenhain <tino@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux