My thought is on it's own pl/pgsql is just as important as straight SQL. Maybe as time goes on we will see higher volumes of pl/pgsql questions, if that is what warrants a separate list. I personally don't see why one would put pl/pgsql in with everything else. Maybe because I come from an Oracle world where volumes of books have been written on PL/SQL on it's own.
Bob
On 6/7/05, Douglas McNaught <doug@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Bob <luckyratfoot@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> What are the opinions on a separate list just for pl/pgsql? Seems
> pl/pgsql deserves her own area. Just wondering if this would make sense,
> and if it did can we have a separate list?
I don't think it makes sense--it's not like traffic related to
pl/pgsql floods out everything else on the list. For better or worse,
it's an integral part of PG--what's the rationale for a separate list?
-Doug
