Some comments: > I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more > Anti-Postgres): I can see skript kiddies preferring MySQL, but a DBA? Time for a credentials review. Firebird is a good small database (small resource footprint) that handles small databases with many users well. It doesn't scale well due to its single file data storage implementation. A good disk farm is mostly wasted on it. I think that comparing Firebird to Oracle functionality can only be done in an extremely superficial manner because of the difference in scalability. So they implemented PL/SQL. Whoopee. Get the source for GNAT and do it for PostgreSQL, if anybody cares. Rick pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 06/06/2005 05:12:05 AM: > I've just been sent this link by our DBA (pro MySQL but even more > Anti-Postgres): > > http://www.janus-software.com/fb_fyracle.html > > I want to know how they've calculated the numbers that they're created > those pie graphs from. The only thing I can think of that Postgres > doesn't have for 'transactions' is two-phase commit, and yet it's > given it 1/2 functionality. > > Anybody else care to comment? > > -- > > Russ > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command > (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
