Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Have a look at Mysql gotchas...

http://sql-info.de/mysql/database-definition.html#2_4





So here's another little gem about our friends from Uppsala: If you create a table with InnoDB storage and your server does not have InnoDB configured, it falls back to MyISAM without telling you.

As it turns out, the test done with PostgreSQL vs. real InnoDB results in just about identical timings (90 min). The test done using PostgreSQL with fsync off vs. MyISAM also results in about identical timings (3 min). So that looks much better, although the update performance of PostgreSQL is still a lot worse.



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
     joining column's datatypes do not match

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux