Search Postgresql Archives

Re: PostgreSQL vs. InnoDB performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Freitag, den 03.06.2005, 00:36 +0200 schrieb Peter Eisentraut:
> On a particular system, loading 1 million rows (100 bytes, nothing 
> fancy) into PostgreSQL one transaction at a time takes about 90 
> minutes.  Doing the same in MySQL/InnoDB takes about 3 minutes.  InnoDB 
> is supposed to have a similar level of functionality as far as the 
> storage manager is concerned, so I'm puzzled about how this can be.  
> Does anyone know whether InnoDB is taking some kind of questionable 
> shortcuts it doesn't tell me about?  The client interface is DBI.  This 
> particular test is supposed to simulate a lot of transactions happening 
> in a short time, so turning off autocommit is not relevant.

Maybe postgres' actually working ref-integrity checks bite here?
That test is a bit vague - maybe we can see more details? :-)

> As you might imagine, it's hard to argue when the customer sees these 
> kinds of numbers.  So I'd take any FUD I can send back at them. :)
> 


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux