On Tue, May 24, 2005 at 19:31:28 -0300, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 24 May 2005, James Croft wrote: > > >Scott Marlowe wrote: > >>I'd go for 8.0. It's quite stable now, and 8.1 will take as long as it > >>needs to take to come out, which could be anything, but will likely be > >>no earlier than the end of the year. > >> > >>I believe there was talk about an 8.1 coming out to replace the caching > >>algorithm, but I believe the change was implemented in 8.0.3 or > >>something like that, so there's no need to push out an 8.1 release. > > > >Thanks Scott. > > Estimate right now for going beta on 8.1 is July 1st ... aiming for a Isn't that feature freeze? Typically there has been a month between feature freeze and the first official beta. > Sep/Oct release ... if you've been around long enough, you'll know how > fluid our 'estimates' tend to be, but that is our current goal ... With a July 1 feature freeze, Nov/Dec is a much better estimate of when there might be an 8.1 release. Even that is on the optimistic side. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend
