On Tue, May 10, 2005 at 02:38:41AM +1000, Neil Conway wrote: > Jim C. Nasby wrote: > >Having indexes that people shouldn't be using does add confusion for > >users, and presents the opportunity for foot-shooting. > > Emitting a warning/notice on hash-index creation is something I've > suggested in the past -- that would be fine with me. Probably not a bad idea. > >Even if there is some kind of advantage (would they possibly speed up > >hash joins?) > > No, hash joins and hash indexes are unrelated. I know they are now, but does that have to be the case? Like I said, I don't know the history, so I don't know why we even have them to begin with. -- Jim C. Nasby, Database Consultant decibel@xxxxxxxxxxx Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828 Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
