Centuries ago, Nostradamus foresaw when smarlowe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Scott Marlowe) would write: > On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 21:06, Vlad wrote: >> the number one aim at the moment is to have "always-up-to-date" copy >> of our main DB with minial performance impact on replication > > Have you considered point in time recovery as implemented in 8.0? > > While it does require some small amount of work to bring the secondary > server up to date, it's not that much, and it gives you very up to date > recoverability. If they want to be able to use the replica, perhaps to run reports on it, that turns out to be problematic. -- select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'cbbrowne.com'; http://linuxfinances.info/info/spreadsheets.html Long computations which yield zero are probably all for naught. ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
