I read the reason for the 5 out of 10 as "little win32 post-install specific documentation", which is quite true, and few google hits on "postgresql getting started" (which is kind of true - 600k vs 2.5M for mysql vs 2.6M for oracle. But it can be debated wether 600,000 pages should actually be enuogh for most cases..). Also, as you say, he missed the mailinglists gated to usenet... Possibly because they are not in the "official hierarchy", but a google search would show those But all in all it certainly put postgresql in good light - as an easy-to-get-started-with database. Which we've previously (IMHO not deserved, but whatever) usually been rated pretty bad at. Will be interesting to see what he comes up with when he starts looking at the feature comparisons. //Magnus > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mohan, Ross > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 11:52 PM > To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Favorable Postgresql write up > > It's nice, "but"...it couldn't possibly be more subjective, > and his ranking of documentation as "5 out of 10" is funny. > He apparently did not even find these many hosted listservs > (only Usenet). <shrug> > > I hope he enjoys his ongoing reviews; I suppose it can't hurt? > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dann Corbit > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 5:28 PM > To: pgsql-general@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Favorable Postgresql write up > > > http://www.suite101.com/article.cfm/oracle/115560 > > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
