>From the title alone, "pgCluster" sounded like the perfect choice for PostgreSQL clustering. However on their homepage they provide very little information is a rough english traslation from what it sounds like. Also: http://pgcluster.projects.postgresql.org/feature.html What happens when the load balancer or replicator goes down? Doesn't seem completly stable to me unless I'm missing something. Does anyone have experience with this? slony1 seems to cut out the balancer and replicator and leave the fallover on server crash for you to figure out. I'm liking the sound of this, however again it's tough to find decent readups on the workings of this program. I found this PDF: http://developer.postgresql.org/~wieck/slony1/Slony-I-concept.pdf Provided interesting information, however I'm wondering does anyone know a site that explains it more? Know of any more online writeups in PDF format? Most importantly, anyone have good experience with this? Thanks for the info, ~PatHaugen On 4/28/05, Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Slony-I isn't clustering. They would have to look at pgCluster or > > something like that. > Sure but it seemed to fit their description of what they > wanted to do. > > Karsten > -- > GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net > E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346 > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your joining column's datatypes do not match