Search Postgresql Archives

Re: UltraSPARC versus AMD

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




pgsql-general-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 04/22/2005 10:08:46 AM:

> On Fri, 2005-04-22 at 09:48, Richard_D_Levine@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I just got done comparing SPECMarks (on spec.org) between Sun's AMD
entry
> > level servers versus similarly configured UltraSPARCs versus desktop
AMD
> > based machines.  Sun's AMD machines are twice as fast as their
UItraSPARCs,
> > for approximately the same price.  What a hoot.
>
> Wow.  I'd certainly like to see the numbers and such from your
> benchmarks.  I have to say I'm not surprised, the 64 bit AMD chips are
> quite impressive pieces of hardware.

The benchmarks aren't mine, they're standard performance evaluation (SPEC)
defined by spec.org

http://www.spec.org

Click on the desired benchmark (I was referring to the CPU benchmarks) and
click on "published results".

The manufacturers (Sun, Dell, HP, etc.) buy the benchmarks, configure their
best compiler for speed, run them, and submit the results.  My point is
that Sun ran the benchmarks, under very strict rules set forth by SPEC.

Rick

>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if
your
>       joining column's datatypes do not match


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?

               http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Postgresql Jobs]     [Postgresql Admin]     [Postgresql Performance]     [Linux Clusters]     [PHP Home]     [PHP on Windows]     [Kernel Newbies]     [PHP Classes]     [PHP Books]     [PHP Databases]     [Postgresql & PHP]     [Yosemite]
  Powered by Linux